(Pardon the latency on this post. I had it in the Drafts section for a while.)
When a website requires a password for registration, said site SHOULD NOT EVER mail you back the password in the clear in an e-mail. Let me repeat that... SHOULD... NOT... EVER.
One of my daughters plays soccer, and has for two towns. My whole family enjoy seeing the Boston Breakers play soccer too. Both my daughter's town website (outsourced to Blue Sombrero) and the Boston Breaker's ticketing website (run by PMI ticketing using TicketSocket's technology) made the aforementioned mistake. Both of them, quickly addressed the issue with direct and up-front e-mails. I believe Blue Sombrero addressed the problem a bit quicker, but that's because of a combination of smaller organizations and the Breakers' mistake happening on a weekend.
The Blue Sombrero handling of my daughter's old town website mistake was quick, and without incident. Hats off (no pun intended) to the Blue Sombrero folks, who I hope have implemented the no-mailing-passwords policy throughout their entire customer base.
One bad thing someone in the Breakers organization did was remove my original complaining posts on Facebook. I suspect this was merely the case of panic and not active malice. The General Manager of the Breakers, Andy Crossley, sent me a mail on Saturday to see what was going on. Once he understood the problem, he got the relevant technical folks involved, and they solved things.
While I'm glad to see quick turnaround on these flaws, the one piece of advice I will reiterate is NEVER SEND OUT CLEARTEXT PASSWORDS. Thank you.
Dan McDonald -- illumos engineer and RTI advocate at Joyent. This blog formerly resided on Sun's blog roll as, "End-to-end... and everything in between."
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Friday, October 7, 2011
Finding Ada, but with better technology examples!
I found out thanks to Denny Gentry about Ada Lovelace Day today. Denny has a great blog post citing three engineers and their work with ATM.
The three engineers are wonderful examples of excellence, ones I'd gladly mention. What bugs me is that he cited... ewww.... ATM. His third paragraph mentioned why I go, "ewww..." over ATM. He didn't have to deal with (I think) some of the politics of ATM zealots, but that doesn't take away from Allyn's, Sally's, or Renee's abilities or contributions.
In fact, it's not difficult to cite further contributions from each of them... two of which I can further support with source code!
First off, Sally Floyd is well known for much TCP and congestion control goodness. If you followed the link to Sally's page you can see all (or at least most) of her work for yourself. I unfortunately don't know of any quickly-linkable code to cite, but I'll gladly accept suggestions.
Allyn Romanow was a engineer at Sun, and worked in my old group (Solaris Internet Engineering) while she was there. Her big contribution to the Solaris TCP/IP stack was the support for large, fast networks (aka. RFC 1323), which you can see scattered throughout the TCP code, particularly here.
Renee Danson (now Sommerfeld), also an engineer at Sun, escaped the world of ATM to join Internet Engineering later on. I was fortunate to have her land with Team IPsec for a while. As we were bringing up IKE for Solaris 9, I was hoping to have a command-line tool alter the running IKE daemon using the Solaris lightweight IPC mechanism known as doors. Renee made this happen. Because of a large OEM component, the IKE daemon source isn't available for browsing, but the control program, ikeadm(1M) is there for the world to see.
An unofficial IETF slogan was, "We believe in rough consensus and running code." I figured it's even better to find Ada with some running code to back it up.
The three engineers are wonderful examples of excellence, ones I'd gladly mention. What bugs me is that he cited... ewww.... ATM. His third paragraph mentioned why I go, "ewww..." over ATM. He didn't have to deal with (I think) some of the politics of ATM zealots, but that doesn't take away from Allyn's, Sally's, or Renee's abilities or contributions.
In fact, it's not difficult to cite further contributions from each of them... two of which I can further support with source code!
First off, Sally Floyd is well known for much TCP and congestion control goodness. If you followed the link to Sally's page you can see all (or at least most) of her work for yourself. I unfortunately don't know of any quickly-linkable code to cite, but I'll gladly accept suggestions.
Allyn Romanow was a engineer at Sun, and worked in my old group (Solaris Internet Engineering) while she was there. Her big contribution to the Solaris TCP/IP stack was the support for large, fast networks (aka. RFC 1323), which you can see scattered throughout the TCP code, particularly here.
Renee Danson (now Sommerfeld), also an engineer at Sun, escaped the world of ATM to join Internet Engineering later on. I was fortunate to have her land with Team IPsec for a while. As we were bringing up IKE for Solaris 9, I was hoping to have a command-line tool alter the running IKE daemon using the Solaris lightweight IPC mechanism known as doors. Renee made this happen. Because of a large OEM component, the IKE daemon source isn't available for browsing, but the control program, ikeadm(1M) is there for the world to see.
An unofficial IETF slogan was, "We believe in rough consensus and running code." I figured it's even better to find Ada with some running code to back it up.
Monday, August 1, 2011
MTV is 30, and do you remember PopClips?
MTV (Music Television... at least it used to be), is 30 today (or yesterday depending on how late I post this). I'm sure lots of people have written about this already. I'd recommend checking out this YouTube channel if you want a glimpse into the past. It has commercials inserted (which I believe weren't actually on MTV in those early days), but otherwise should stir some 1981 memories.
I'm here to write about a precursor to MTV that I remember seeing months before MTV appeared. Nickelodeon used to air a show on Sunday nights called "PopClips". Internet searching on it turns up very little. The Wikipedia article sums up all of my own recollections, and includes some tidbits that former Monkee Michael Nesmith produced the show.
Do any of you half-dozen readers who are approximately my age (40s) remember PopClips? I remember seeing some good videos on there that did eventually make their way to MTV (my favorite specifically from PopClips was "Walking on the Moon" from The Police). The amount of collective net data on PopClips is surprisingly sparse.
I'm here to write about a precursor to MTV that I remember seeing months before MTV appeared. Nickelodeon used to air a show on Sunday nights called "PopClips". Internet searching on it turns up very little. The Wikipedia article sums up all of my own recollections, and includes some tidbits that former Monkee Michael Nesmith produced the show.
Do any of you half-dozen readers who are approximately my age (40s) remember PopClips? I remember seeing some good videos on there that did eventually make their way to MTV (my favorite specifically from PopClips was "Walking on the Moon" from The Police). The amount of collective net data on PopClips is surprisingly sparse.
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
WRITE_SAME support now in Illumos COMSTAR
The WRITE_SAME primitive is now available in Illumos as of this push:
13382:d84aa76f7cd2 Dan McDonald
937 WRITE_SAME support for COMSTAR
Reviewed by: Gordon Ross
Reviewed by: Richard Elling
Reviewed by: Robert Gordon
Approved by: Gordon Ross
Sumit Gupta wrote the original contribution, and after a bit of my own massaging, it's now in Illumos. Unlike the UNMAP push, this one did not have a lot of rewhacking (in large part due to its lower amount of direct interaction with ZFS).
The WRITE_SAME primitive works pretty much like its name. The iSCSI initiator passes in a WRITE_SAME primitive along with a single disk block. The iSCSI target then writes the same block over the range of logical block addresses specified in the command.
One set of experiments I did prior to integration was figuring out what size buffer to allocate for an I/O. In a perfect world, you don't want to do sbd_write() calls for every 512-byte block. On the other hand, you also don't want to force the kmem allocator to perform unholy tasks of allocation. I settled on a default of 128kbytes, which has a kmem_cache magazine backing it up (according to kmem stats). Users can experiment with this themselves by tweaking stmf_sbd's sbd_write_same_optimal_chunk variable. Every WRITE_SAME request, once it generates the data, consults this variable prior to allocating a block. Source-junkies can look here for the function in question.
Happy block-writing, folks!
13382:d84aa76f7cd2 Dan McDonald
937 WRITE_SAME support for COMSTAR
Reviewed by: Gordon Ross
Reviewed by: Richard Elling
Reviewed by: Robert Gordon
Approved by: Gordon Ross
Sumit Gupta wrote the original contribution, and after a bit of my own massaging, it's now in Illumos. Unlike the UNMAP push, this one did not have a lot of rewhacking (in large part due to its lower amount of direct interaction with ZFS).
The WRITE_SAME primitive works pretty much like its name. The iSCSI initiator passes in a WRITE_SAME primitive along with a single disk block. The iSCSI target then writes the same block over the range of logical block addresses specified in the command.
One set of experiments I did prior to integration was figuring out what size buffer to allocate for an I/O. In a perfect world, you don't want to do sbd_write() calls for every 512-byte block. On the other hand, you also don't want to force the kmem allocator to perform unholy tasks of allocation. I settled on a default of 128kbytes, which has a kmem_cache magazine backing it up (according to kmem stats). Users can experiment with this themselves by tweaking stmf_sbd's sbd_write_same_optimal_chunk variable. Every WRITE_SAME request, once it generates the data, consults this variable prior to allocating a block. Source-junkies can look here for the function in question.
Happy block-writing, folks!
Thursday, April 7, 2011
Showing your kids the Star Wars films - which order?
WARNING: Spoilers for the Star Wars movies. Here's some old-school spoiler space...
We finally finished (in fits and starts) showing our twin 8-year-olds all six Star Wars films. We showed them in the order Wendy and I saw them on the big screen: 4 (Star Wars), 5 (The Empire Strikes Back, 6 (Return of the Jedi), 1 (The Phantom Menace), 2 (Attack of the Clones), and finally 3 (Revenge of the Sith). Now I'll admit we skipped over char-broiled Anakin and Vader's suit-fitting during Sith, but they're 8, what would you expect?
As we finished up, something occurred to me. I remember reading my favorite online-exclusive film critic (and fellow parent) Drew McWeeney mentioning toward the bottom of this article that he was going to show them to his son in a slightly different order: 4, 5, 1, 2, 3, 6.
That's a fascinating way to show them. At the end of The Empire Strikes Back the first-time viewer may have a question about whether or not Darth Vader is Luke's father. Why not, at that point, show the first-time viewer the story of Anakin Skywalker? This works especially well now, where the special-edition Empire uses Ian McDiarmid's Emperor Palpatine, and an astute child will notice how much Darth Sidious resembles him (or even Senator Palpatine).
Commenters (oh gotta love Internet feedback... makes me glad I only have a half-dozen readers) mention a few other orders: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ("to get the crap out of the way"), or the flip-flop 1, 4, 2, 5, 3, 6 (tracking both in single steps).
There's a little part of me that wishes we tried the flashback-in-the-middle approach, but the only thing that matters is that our girls enjoyed the movies, and now they get one or two more of the jokes Wendy and I make.
We finally finished (in fits and starts) showing our twin 8-year-olds all six Star Wars films. We showed them in the order Wendy and I saw them on the big screen: 4 (Star Wars), 5 (The Empire Strikes Back, 6 (Return of the Jedi), 1 (The Phantom Menace), 2 (Attack of the Clones), and finally 3 (Revenge of the Sith). Now I'll admit we skipped over char-broiled Anakin and Vader's suit-fitting during Sith, but they're 8, what would you expect?
As we finished up, something occurred to me. I remember reading my favorite online-exclusive film critic (and fellow parent) Drew McWeeney mentioning toward the bottom of this article that he was going to show them to his son in a slightly different order: 4, 5, 1, 2, 3, 6.
That's a fascinating way to show them. At the end of The Empire Strikes Back the first-time viewer may have a question about whether or not Darth Vader is Luke's father. Why not, at that point, show the first-time viewer the story of Anakin Skywalker? This works especially well now, where the special-edition Empire uses Ian McDiarmid's Emperor Palpatine, and an astute child will notice how much Darth Sidious resembles him (or even Senator Palpatine).
Commenters (oh gotta love Internet feedback... makes me glad I only have a half-dozen readers) mention a few other orders: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ("to get the crap out of the way"), or the flip-flop 1, 4, 2, 5, 3, 6 (tracking both in single steps).
There's a little part of me that wishes we tried the flashback-in-the-middle approach, but the only thing that matters is that our girls enjoyed the movies, and now they get one or two more of the jokes Wendy and I make.
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
For Illumos newbies: On developing small
I just finished a chat with a person who's doing a device driver, and he was worried that a certain header file wasn't available in his /usr/include. This struck me as odd, as I always get my headers from the workspace's proto area...
Then I realized I've had 15 years at Sun under my belt and this person's a complete newbie.
I haven't looked very closely at the Illumos build instructions, but I'm going to do some things now that will help kernel module writers (e.g. device drivers) get started without resorting to a full build right off the bat. I'll assume that you've installed the appropriate compilers and the "onbld" package so that you have a populated /opt/onbld/bin.
STEP 1: The /opt/onbld/bin/ws command:
When you go to work in an Illumos source base, your best off "entering it" via the ws command. I've hacked my .tcshrc to print a different prompt when I'm in with ws. Here, check it out:
You'll notice a few things got set in the environment. What I use to alter my .tcshrc is the CODEMGR_WS variable. You should do the same in your favorite shell's config.
UPDATE: You will need to set SPRO_ROOT and BUILD_TOOLS after invoking ws. I do this already in my .tcshrc, but forgot to report it. A newer tool: bldenv, fixes this, but currently at the cost of a configuration file. There's talk of merging ws's simplicity with bldenv's completeness.
One of the key concepts in building Illumos is the "proto area". This is a version of the root filesystem that lives within your source tree. You'll see it set above. There's one per basic architecture type (i386 or sparc). When a full "nightly" build happens, the proto area gets populated with headers, libraries, commands, kernel modules, etc., and then the packaging tools sweep up their input from the proto area. The proto area contains more than what is on a running system.
You need to populate your proto area with basics (directory structures, etc.) to start.
The "sgs" target sets up the proto area completely.
If you're proceeding to build, say, kernel modules, you should populate the kernel include files in the proto area.
UPDATE Fellow Illumos hacker Rich Lowe has informed me that "dmake setup" does both sgs and install_h in one fell swoop.
And then you can go and compile your kernel module. I'll use "ip" as an example:
If you want to lint-check your module, don't do the obvious "make lint" but instead do "make modlintlib". This will perform basic lint sanity without the overhead of a full crosscheck.
Now if you want to do something in userland, you'll need to do more than a simple header install. You MIGHT need to bringup libraries too, because it's possible your workspace's libraries have different versions than the machine you're actually building on.
If you utter "dmake install", it's going to be a while. You can, if you know only a certain library was altered, cd into that library and utter "dmake install" in there. For example:
Then you can go to, say, your new command, and start compiling and debugging there. Once you're done, you can exit this shell, and it will return you to your original pre-ws shell.
Hopefully this will lower some of the barriers to entry for budding Illumos hackers.
Then I realized I've had 15 years at Sun under my belt and this person's a complete newbie.
I haven't looked very closely at the Illumos build instructions, but I'm going to do some things now that will help kernel module writers (e.g. device drivers) get started without resorting to a full build right off the bat. I'll assume that you've installed the appropriate compilers and the "onbld" package so that you have a populated /opt/onbld/bin.
STEP 1: The /opt/onbld/bin/ws command:
When you go to work in an Illumos source base, your best off "entering it" via the ws command. I've hacked my .tcshrc to print a different prompt when I'm in with ws. Here, check it out:
everywhere(~)[1]% ws ws/to_mhi
Workspace : /export/home/danmcd/ws/to_mhi
Workspace Parent : /export/home/danmcd/ws/illumos-clone
Proto area ($ROOT) : /export/home/danmcd/ws/to_mhi/proto/root_i386
Parent proto area ($PARENT_ROOT) : /export/home/danmcd/ws/illumos-clone/proto/root_i386
Root of source ($SRC) : /export/home/danmcd/ws/to_mhi/usr/src
Root of test source ($TSRC) : /export/home/danmcd/ws/to_mhi/usr/ontest
Current directory ($PWD) : /export/home/danmcd/ws/to_mhi
WS-everywhere-WS(~/ws/to_mhi)[0]%
You'll notice a few things got set in the environment. What I use to alter my .tcshrc is the CODEMGR_WS variable. You should do the same in your favorite shell's config.
UPDATE: You will need to set SPRO_ROOT and BUILD_TOOLS after invoking ws. I do this already in my .tcshrc, but forgot to report it. A newer tool: bldenv, fixes this, but currently at the cost of a configuration file. There's talk of merging ws's simplicity with bldenv's completeness.
One of the key concepts in building Illumos is the "proto area". This is a version of the root filesystem that lives within your source tree. You'll see it set above. There's one per basic architecture type (i386 or sparc). When a full "nightly" build happens, the proto area gets populated with headers, libraries, commands, kernel modules, etc., and then the packaging tools sweep up their input from the proto area. The proto area contains more than what is on a running system.
You need to populate your proto area with basics (directory structures, etc.) to start.
WS-everywhere-WS(~/ws/to_mhi)[1]% cd $SRC
WS-everywhere-WS(usr/src)[0]% pwd
/export/home/danmcd/ws/to_mhi/usr/src
WS-everywhere-WS(usr/src)[0]% dmake sgs
< Go get a drink of water or coffee, it's gonna be a bit... >
WS-everywhere-WS(usr/src)[1]%
The "sgs" target sets up the proto area completely.
If you're proceeding to build, say, kernel modules, you should populate the kernel include files in the proto area.
WS-everywhere-WS(~/ws/to_mhi)[0]% cd usr/src/uts
WS-everywhere-WS(src/uts)[0]% dmake install_h
< TONS of output deleted... >
WS-everywhere-WS(src/uts)[0]%
UPDATE Fellow Illumos hacker Rich Lowe has informed me that "dmake setup" does both sgs and install_h in one fell swoop.
And then you can go and compile your kernel module. I'll use "ip" as an example:
WS-everywhere-WS(src/uts)[1]% cd intel/ip
WS-everywhere-WS(intel/ip)[0]% pwd
/export/home/danmcd/ws/to_mhi/usr/src/uts/intel/ip
WS-everywhere-WS(intel/ip)[0]% dmake
< MORE output deleted... >
WS-everywhere-WS(intel/ip)[0]%
If you want to lint-check your module, don't do the obvious "make lint" but instead do "make modlintlib". This will perform basic lint sanity without the overhead of a full crosscheck.
Now if you want to do something in userland, you'll need to do more than a simple header install. You MIGHT need to bringup libraries too, because it's possible your workspace's libraries have different versions than the machine you're actually building on.
WS-everywhere-WS(intel/ip)[0]% cd $SRC/lib
WS-everywhere-WS(src/lib)[0]%
If you utter "dmake install", it's going to be a while. You can, if you know only a certain library was altered, cd into that library and utter "dmake install" in there. For example:
WS-everywhere-WS(src/lib)[0]% cd libipsecutil
WS-everywhere-WS(lib/libipsecutil)[0]% dmake install_h
< output deleted... >
WS-everywhere-WS(lib/libipsecutil)[0]% dmake install
< MORE output deleted... >
WS-everywhere-WS(lib/libipsecutil)[0]%
Then you can go to, say, your new command, and start compiling and debugging there. Once you're done, you can exit this shell, and it will return you to your original pre-ws shell.
Hopefully this will lower some of the barriers to entry for budding Illumos hackers.
Thursday, March 10, 2011
Finally unpacked
I think I've managed to move all of my old blog entries over from blogs.sun.com. Hopefully I'll be posting some Illumos-related technical content before too long. Stay tuned!
Monday, March 7, 2011
Hello again, world!
At Wendy's and Garrett's advice, I've set up shop here on Blogger/Blogspot.
I plan on importing all of my old Sun blog posts here, but I exported in a non-blogger non-XML (ick) format. So I'll be backpatching by copy-and-paste when time allows.
Happy blog reading, you half-dozen readers! :)
I plan on importing all of my old Sun blog posts here, but I exported in a non-blogger non-XML (ick) format. So I'll be backpatching by copy-and-paste when time allows.
Happy blog reading, you half-dozen readers! :)
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
A final suggested read
David Reed passed along a pointer to this paper by Dan Geer:
A Time for Choosing
Please read it, and understand the founding spirit of the Internet. And with that, I say goodbye to Oracle.
A Time for Choosing
Please read it, and understand the founding spirit of the Internet. And with that, I say goodbye to Oracle.
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
I'm leaving Oracle, and switching gears
15 years ago I was finishing up last-minute changes at NRL while getting ready to move coasts. While I'm not moving coasts, I'm at the point where I'm finishing up last-minute changes again.
I'm leaving Oracle this week, and will be trying something a bit different after that. I've been doing IPsec or at least TCP/IP related work for the entirety of my time at Sun. I expect to be back in TCP/IP-land relatively soon, but I will be learning some new-to-me technologies in the immediate future.
I've met and worked with some extraordinary people during my time at Sun. I hope to keep in touch with them after I depart. If any of you half-dozen readers wish to keep up, I'd suggest following my Twitter feed until I decide whether or not I find a new home for this blog. I'm also findable on Facebook and LinkedIn for those so inclined.
I'm leaving Oracle this week, and will be trying something a bit different after that. I've been doing IPsec or at least TCP/IP related work for the entirety of my time at Sun. I expect to be back in TCP/IP-land relatively soon, but I will be learning some new-to-me technologies in the immediate future.
I've met and worked with some extraordinary people during my time at Sun. I hope to keep in touch with them after I depart. If any of you half-dozen readers wish to keep up, I'd suggest following my Twitter feed until I decide whether or not I find a new home for this blog. I'm also findable on Facebook and LinkedIn for those so inclined.